Earl Gales complaint based on fake documents?

We have received and reviewed the attached document, presenting the promises from Elliott and Catledge to Earl Gales.

For some reasons this document does not appear to be an Elliott nor an Impact document.

- If it would have been done by Elliott, Derek would have signed it. He wouldn't have used the company "Elliott Resorts", he would have used “EMI Resorts (SVG) Inc". The signature is not Derek’s.

- If it would have been done by Catledge, and signed by him, it wouldn’t have been "Impact, Inc.", it would have been “D.R.C.I. Inc.”. The signature is not Catledge’s.

- The impression is created that the document was produced by Jerry Gerber. Is it Jerry’s style to put his document path on the bottom? It is definitively Lambert's style.

We may only guess who made this document. The facts are: 

1) Signatures are fake

2) Impact would present wrong information and assume responsibility at the same moment for their representations.

3) Companies mentioned were never supposed to be used for agreements.

4) Communications exist where WPL plans to throw the Idaho and Gales cases on to Impact.

http://www.sunvillagefacts.com/files/Agreements/PagesFromCompleteGalesComplaint60-63.pdf

How much commission did they pay?

40% - 45% Percent!!!

http://sunvillagefacts.com/files/Agreements/AvianceAgreement.pdf

What happened to the escrow that elliott told everyone was in place?

No money was available for escrow, but other "suppliers" were paid. Note the dates:

Date	2/14/2005
Amount	25,000.00
Ordering Customer	CCW Ltd
Sender's Correspondent	Banco Multiple Leon, S.A.
Beneficiary's Account	990117921
Beneficiary Customer Name	HLG
Remittance Information
Date	10/5/2005
Amount	100,000.00
Ordering Customer	CCW Limited
Sender's Correspondent	Banco Multiple Leon, S.A.
Beneficiary's Account	990117921
Beneficiary Customer Name	HLG Rio Suite Hotel and Casino
Remittance Information
Date	10/6/2005
Amount	25,000.00
Ordering Customer	CCW Ltd
Sender's Correspondent	Banco Multiple Leon, S.A.
Beneficiary's Account	990117921
Beneficiary Customer Name	HLG Rio Suite Hotel and Casino
Remittance Information	RFB Mike Fitzpatrick
Date	11/10/2005
Amount	130,000.00
Ordering Customer	CCW Ltd
Sender's Correspondent	Banco Multiple Leon, S.A.
Beneficiary's Account	990117921
Beneficiary Customer Name	HLG Rio Suite Hotel and Casino
Remittance Information	RFB Ref J. Ferrell

Nice try to shut us down, but we are back!

After the legal threats we had to consider how we move on. And we will go ahead despite threats of lawsuit!

Be ready again for more accurate information within the next few days.

Blame PC and promise improvements

- We will not allow anyone to disturb that and will defend our company

[Very true, we all have learned about the Elliott counter lawsuits against unruly investors]

- we did continue to support his large financial compensation and generous lifestyle

[is this about Pablo or about Derek? We just have seen his Credit Card statement]

- Pablo was allowed to continue to control all of the finances of the company

- gave him an unlimited budget

[Why would they?]

- we all knew that changes had to be made

- we have appointed a very qualified hotel controller

[This is it, they blame an event or a person and promised positive changes which never happened. This is why we have seen the past losses and still believed in future profits]

- We have been suspicious of several transactions

[Suspicious gamble transactions? Credit Card payments? Marketing Expenses?]

- wages to his staff far above industry norm

[we need somebody sending us a corporate payroll and compare to the industry norm]

- to satisfy his employment termination as well as a professional non‐disclosure

- Neither of these agreements have been honored

- Pablo Chavez has attempted to twist and manipulate a situation within our company that is wrong, untrue and unjust through his actions and false allegations

[The non disclosure agreement is very important to Derek. There are rumors that Pablo Chavez disclosed information to a group of shareholders. These shareholders are facing a lawsuit from Elliott. Is he referring to the gambling payments by false allegations?]

- We as a company will always do whatever possible to avoid a fight

[He is contradicting his previous statement]

- nor will we fall victim to blackmail or extortion

[blackmail or extortion for something they did wrong?]

Who paid for this?

This is a ONE MONTH statement. Multiply this by 12 for one year. You may google the mentioned businesses so you get an idea what they paid for and who paid for this.

No wonder she is "Angry in Texas"